injunction

What is an Injunction?

An injunction is a Court order directing a person or entity to do a specific thing or not to do a something.

Most injunctions are temporary and are often made pending the outcome of a full hearing (known as an “interlocutory injunction“). An example may be to restrain a former employee from doing work for former clients where they have agreed to post-employment restraints pending a hearing on whether the restraint is lawful or to prohibit the publication of a potentially defamatory article in a newspaper or television program.

A Court will not grant an interlocutory injunction unless:

  • the Plaintiff has made out a “prima facie” case – a sufficient likelihood of success to justify in the circumstances the preservation of the status quo pending the trial – or established that there is a serious question to be heard;
  • the balance of convenience favours the granting of the injunction; and
  • the Plaintiff provides “the usual undertaking as to damages” (that they will pay any damages the restrained party suffers if at a final hearing the Court determines that the injunction wasn’t justified).

A Court has discretion as to whether to make such an order and will consider thongs like whether or not you have asked the other party to do/not do the relevant thing, whether damages would be an appropriate remedy, if you have waited too long to seek the order etc.

Where an injunction is sought from a Court without the affected party being notified, this is known as an “ex-parte injunction” as it is made in the absence of a party. They are for that reason only temporary and the Court requires the applicant to disclose all relevant facts to the case, including those that may lead to refusal of the application, not just those in favour of the injunction as there is no respondent in Court to oppose it. Examples can be “freezing orders” that stop the sale of assets or to freeze a bank account to preserve them pending the Court’s further orders.

Mandatory injunctions can be obtained where for example a party to a contract refuses to comply with their lawful obligations under it. An example of this is a party to a Contract for the Sale of Land that unlawfully refuses to sign a Transfer in registrable form. Such an injunction imposes a positive obligation on the affected party to do something, not just stopping them from doing something.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information in relation to business succession, estate planning, litigation and dispute resolution or any commercial law matter, contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your commercial law needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn Facebook Instagram

What is a restraint of trade?

Post engagement restrictions

Often, employment contracts and contractor agreements contain restrictive covenants or ‘restraints of trade’ to protect businesses when an employee or service provider / contractor leaves.

So, what is a restraint of trade? A restraint of trade is effectively a restriction on the employee or contractor as to where they may work and who they may work for during, and for an agreed period after the termination of, their engagement. Restraints often restrict an employee’s ability to work for competing businesses and within a certain geographical area for a specified period of time.

How far can they go?

A valid restraint should only restrict activities reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the business that has the benefit of it. Those legitimate interests may include clients, referral relationships, trade secrets, confidential information and the like.

A restraint clause that is too wide, and therefore too restrictive, is generally unenforceable. A restraint should be tailored to accurately reflect the nature of the business activities being protected and only go so far as to protect them, when looked at reasonably. Where restraints seek to protect more than is reasonably necessary to protect the business, they can be struck down. There are public policy considerations in not preventing competition. Restraints are read strictly against the business that seeks to impose it.

Where there are no restraints in the employment or services agreement, there is no restraint and the business will only be able to rely upon their common law rights, which are often inadequate.

How are they enforced?

To enforce a restraint, the court requires that the party seeking to enforce it show that the restraint is reasonable – this will depend on the nature of the business, the restraint period, the restraint area and the nature of the work undertaken by the person or entity affected by it.

Often, enforcement takes the form of an injunction, seeking damages or an accounting for profits.

Further information

If you would like any more information in relation to employment law, disputes or business issues generally, please contact Craig Pryor on (02) 9521 2455 or email craig@mckilloplegal.com.au

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your business and employment law needs.