record

Spent Convictions

If you are found guilty by a Court of breaking the law and committing an offence, or you plead guilty to committing an offence, you may have a criminal conviction placed on your record – the formal record of any offences a person has committed as maintained by the police.

Your criminal record is generally not available to anyone without your consent, but there are exceptions such as information sharing between law enforcement agencies, government departments and the Courts. You might also need a copy of your criminal record (such as by obtaining a National Police Check through NSW Police Force, Criminal Records or other agencies) when apply for a job or to work as a volunteer, work with children, apply for certain insurances, seek to adopt or seek a visa to travel.

Do convictions stay on your record forever?

In New South Wales, the Criminal Records Act 1991 (NSW) governs the effect of a person’s conviction for a relatively minor offence if the person completes a period of crime-free behaviour. It also and makes provision with respect to quashed convictions and pardons.

A “quashed” conviction is a conviction that has been set aside by the Court.

A “pardon” means a free and absolute pardon that has been granted to a person because he or she was wrongly convicted of an offence.

In relation to NSW convictions, they generally becomes a “spent conviction” if a person has had a 10 year crime-free period (as an adult) from the date of the conviction however, there are certain exceptions to the spent conviction regime, which include:

  • where a prison sentence (not periodic or home detention) of more than 6 months has been imposed (eg rape, murder etc;
  • convictions against companies and other corporate bodies;
  • sexual offences; and
  • convictions prescribed by the Regulations made under the Act.

Some convictions are ‘spent’ immediately for example where a an offence is proved or a person is found guilty without proceeding to a formal conviction.

In the NSW Children’s Court, the crime-free period is 3 years, during which the person must not be the subject of a control order, be convicted of an offence punishable by prison and must not have been in prison or unlawfully at large. In the Children’s Court, an order that a charge be dismissed and a caution administered means the order is spent after the caution is given.

Each State and Territory as well as the Commonwealth has their own legislation regarding spent convictions (and those relating to juvenile offences which range from a 3-5 year of crime-free period) and they are generally similar in operation. Click here for a useful summary in each jurisdiction

What is the benefit if having ‘spent’ convictions?

Society has determined that after the completion of a specified crime-free period, a person need not be burdened by the stigma of being a criminal.

The benefit for former criminals of having convictions become “spent” is that if a person’s conviction is spent, he or she is not required to disclose information concerning the spent conviction to any other person for any purpose (even if the person is specifically asked a question concerning their criminal history). Obviously any convictions which are not spent must be disclosed.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

Stay up to date - LinkedIn Facebook Twitter | Instagram

Recording a private conversation without consent

Technology today is amazing. We have smartphones almost immediately available – they are light, portable and small are often used to record events… but how does that ease and regularity of use sit with an individual’s right to privacy?

In New South Wales, the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 regulates the use of listening devices.  That Act also covers the use of data surveillance, optical surveillance devices and tracking devices. Breaches of the Act can lead to criminal charges.

What is a listening device?

The Act defines a listening device as:

any device capable of being used to overhear, record, monitor or listen to a conversation or words spoken to or by any person in conversation, but does not include a hearing aid or similar device used by a person with impaired hearing to overcome the impairment and permit that person to hear only sounds ordinarily audible to the human ear

so it clearly includes mobile phones, GoPros and video cameras.

It is an offence under s.7 to knowingly install, use or cause to be used or maintain a listening device to overhear, record, monitor or listen to a private conversation to which the person is not a party or to record a private conversation to which the person is a party.

There are some exceptions to this however, such as if:

  • all principal parties to the private conversation expressly or impliedly consent to its use, or
  • you are a principal party to the private conversation and:
    • it is reasonably necessary to protect your lawful interests; or
    • you do not intend to communicate or publish what was recorded or a report of it to anyone who was not party to the private conversation

The onus of proof for establishing an exception lies on the party seeking to establish the exception, and that onus is on the balance of probabilities.

Law enforcement officials can use listening devices in a range of circumstances including where they have a warrant from a Judge or Magistrate; if they don’t have a warrant but there is a serious or urgent matter requiring its use but not enough time to get a warrant; or where a police officer wearing a visible body worn video device etc.

Even if in Court proceedings, the exception to the rule is not found to apply, it might still (but in certain circumstances only) be possible to have the recording, or evidence based on it such as a transcript of what was said, admitted into evidence under the improperly obtained evidence rules in s.138 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).

What is a private conversation?

A private conversation is conversation where it can be reasonably assumed that those involved in the conversation do not want the conversation to be overheard by others, that is, it is more informal or not public. A private conversation is not private if the people in the conversation can reasonably expect the conversation to be overheard by others.

Penalties

The best course is generally not to record a private conversation without consent unless it is absolutely necessary.

The penalty for individuals for a serious breach of the Act is an $11,000 fine or up to 5 years in prison.

A person who intentionally or recklessly communicates or publishes the contents of a private conversation which could endanger the health or safety of someone, or prejudice an investigation, faces a maximum penalty of 7 years in prison.

For corporations, offences under the Act attract a maximum fine of up to $55,000.

FURTHER INFORMATION

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice.

For more information, please contact Craig Pryor at McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email craig@mckilloplegal.com.au to discuss your needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn Facebook Twitter