Risk management

Commercial Leases

A commercial lease, simply put is the agreement between the owner of business premises (the lessor) to the tenant that is to occupy those premises (the lessee).

The terms of each commercial lease can and usually do differ depending on the nature of the property, the location and the use to which the premises are to be put. There are however many terms that are common to all leases, even if they may be drafted differently in each lease document.

Sometimes confusion arises as to whether a lease is of commercial premises as opposed to retail premises. Retail leases are covered by the Retail Leases Act and there are many additional obligations on the Lessor in relation to retail premises such as the provision of a Disclosure Statement, minimum lease term etc

Prior to entering into a lease, it is a good idea to obtain a condition report or at least take photos or video to show the condition of the premises as at the commencement date and to show what fixtures and fittings were in place.

Some key considerations in relation to a business or commercial lease include:

  • Development consent for the intended use of the premises
  • Term
  • Options to renew or buy
  • Rent
  • The process for and timing of rent reviews (CPI, market, fixed increase etc)
  • Outgoings
  • Security bonds
  • Director guarantees
  • Costs
  • Insurances
  • Repair and maintenance obligations
  • Lessee’s make good and refurbishment obligations on termination
  • Any pre-lease works/promises made
  • Assignment and sub-letting/licensing

It is not uncommon for the parties to enter into a Heads of Agreement or similar document whereby some or all of the above matters and more are documented briefly, such that the key terms are signed off as agreed, but it is usually important to ensure that this document itself doesn’t create a lease and is in fact subject to the parties negotiating and signing a formal written Commercial Lease.

Leasing can be complicated so it pays to seek the advice of a lawyer before entering into a Commercial Lease, an Agreement for Lease or a Heads of Agreement.

FURTHER INFORMATION

Craig Pryor is principal solicitor at McKillop Legal. For further information in relation to the leasing or licensing of business premises, commercial law or business related matters, contact Craig Pryor on (02) 9521 2455 or email craig@mckilloplegal.com.au.

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your legal concerns or objectives.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter

in Business / Commercial Law / General / Property / Risk management  by 01 Apr 2026 0 comments

What is a Granny Flat Right?

WHAT IS A GRANNY FLAT RIGHT?

You can have a granny flat interest in any kind of dwelling, not just those typically referred to as a “granny flat” (a separate, self-contained building or living area attached to a home or property). It must be a private residence and your principal home.

You cannot however, have a granny flat interest in a property in which you have legal ownership (or your partner or a company or trust that you control).

A “granny flat right” or a “granny flat interest” is where you pay for the right to live in a specific home for life.

Granny flat interests are usually family arrangements providing company and support for older people, but they don’t have to be for social security purposes. They are created when you exchange assets, money or both for a right to live in someone else’s property for life. For example, you could:

  • transfer ownership of your home but keep a lifelong right to live there or in another private property; or
  • transfer assets, including money, in return for a lifelong right to live in a home.

The granny flat right only lasts for your lifetime. It’s not part of your estate when you die, so you can’t give it in your will as part of your estate plan.

DOCUMENTATION

A granny flat right does not have to be in writing however, given that amounts that can be paid for a granny flat right can be significant and they are usually funded by significant events like the sale of a family home, it can be a very good idea to get a lawyer to draw up a legal document so you have proof of what you and the owner have agreed to in relation to the granny flat arrangement.

A Granny Flat Right Agreement can include many things in addition to the amount paid, such as what happens if the property is sold, whether the right can be transferred to another property or what you may get back if you give up your granny flat right, as well as what regular contributions for rent, maintenance or outgoings (insurance, rates, phone etc) may have been agreed.

GIFTING RULES & THE REASONABLENESS TEST

In Centrelink/Department of Human Services terms, a “deprived asset”, also known as “gifting”, is where you give away an asset without getting something of at least equal value in return.

The value of a granny flat right is the amount paid, or the value of the assets transferred, in return for a life interest or life estate in a property.

Centrelink may apply the “reasonableness test” in determining the amount that should be paid for a granny flat right. This test is based on a formula based on a conversation factor relating to your age next birthday and the couple age pension rate.

If the amount paid is equal to or below the value determined by the reasonableness test, then there is no deprivation. However, if the amount you paid for the granny flat right is more than the cost or value of the granny flat right, the excess amount paid is considered to be a “deprived asset”.

This could affect the amount of pension you are paid.

Depending on the value of the granny flat right, you may be considered as a home owner for Centrelink (assets test) assessment purposes, even though you don’t own the home you have the granny flat right in.

WANT MORE INFORMATION?

Speak to us about how we can assist you to draft a Granny Flat Right Agreement to document your arrangements regarding the use and occupation of part of your home. We will liaise with your financial planner to cover off the financial and social security aspects as there may be other things you can do like contribute proceeds of sale to super.

Craig Pryor is principal solicitor at McKillop Legal. For further information in relation to documenting co-habitation and property use agreements and estate planning matters generally, contact Craig Pryor on (02) 9521 2455 or email craig@mckilloplegal.com.au.

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter

in Asset Protection / Dispute Resolution / Estate Planning / General / Property / Risk management  by 01 Mar 2026 0 comments

What is a Buy/Sell Deed?

WHY HAVE A BUY/SELL DEED?

A Buy/Sell Deed is an agreement between the owners of a company or unit trust that upon the death or permanent disablement of a director or key person associated with a shareholder/unitholder, that shareholder/unitholder must transfer its shares to the remaining shareholders in exchange for payment.

The method of determining the price is agreed and the funding of that payment usually comes from the proceeds of insurance policies to be taken out for those risks by the shareholders/unitholders.

A Buy/Sell Agreement is not a general Shareholders Agreement or Unitholders Agreement, so it does not regulate all dealings in relation to the company (however the Buy/Sell obligations can be in such agreements rather than in a separate document).

COMMON SCENARIOS A BUY/SELL DEED COULD HELP PREVENT

Consider the following and how it may affect you and your company…

  • A shareholder dies and you as the remaining shareholder inherit an unintended (and potentially non-income producing) business partner such as the deceased shareholder’s spouse (as they receive the deceased’s assets via their Will or intestacy), with company profits being paid out according to the respective shareholdings.
  • You have to buy shares from a deceased shareholder’s estate above their value.
  • Your family do not get the best price for your shares in the company.
  • The remaining shareholders don’t have available funds to pay out a deceased shareholder or a shareholder who can no longer contribute to the business due to total and permanent disability.
  • The business either needs to be sold or funds need to be borrowed by the remaining shareholders or the company to make the payments.
  • A key person to the company has died, leaving the company in the position of losing a key source of revenue, client relationships and knowhow, affecting the value of the company and its business and its viability in the future.

CERTAINTY

A Buy/Sell Agreement is designed to bring certainty in relation to the exit from a business as the result of death or permanent disability of a key person – certainty for an ill shareholder, a deceased shareholder’s family, the remaining owners and the company itself. Don’t leave it to chance.

FURTHER INFORMATION

Craig Pryor is principal solicitor at McKillop Legal. For further information in relation to Buy/Sell Deeds, Shareholders Agreements, any or any commercial dispute or issue, contact Craig Pryor on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au.

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your legal concerns or objectives.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn| Facebook | Twitter | McKillop Legal Blog

in Business / Commercial Law / Dispute Resolution / Risk management  by 01 Feb 2026 0 comments

eBikes – are you covered for claims?

eBikes are in the news a lot of late, usually because of near misses and claims that riders are not wearing helmets or driving dangerously. Electric bicycles have risen in popularity because they offer the ability for many, particularly children, to drive themselves around over longer distances than if they had to pedal.

They also save parents time in ferrying their kids around, and money otherwise spent on taxis and Ubers and the like, but without the financial costs associated with cars and motorbikes, each of which require:

  • licensing; and
  • insurance.

Whatever your view is on whether eBike riders should pay for a license to use the roads like other road users, some of the cost of which goes towards the costs of maintaining road infrastructure and the like, one things that is often forgotten is the risk of damage to property, injury or death.

Unlike with a car or motorcycle, that must at least have compulsory third party insurance coverage and regular inspections to maintain registration for use on the roads, there is no requirement for eBikes to be registered, have inspections for roadworthiness… or to have any insurance at all.

As children are the main users of bikes and eBikes, they don’t think about things like insurance, but what would happen for example if your son or daughter drove into the side of a prestige car, hit and seriously injured a person or worse… killed them? Are you covered for claims?

Given the significant risks of injury to persons and damage to property, it can be a good idea to consider whether you can get insurance cover in place. This can be standalone specific cover or perhaps an add on to an existing policy such as home and contents insurance.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

in Asset Protection / Criminal Law / General / Litigation / Risk management  by 01 Dec 2025 0 comments

Smart glasses and recording without consent

Smartphones are everywhere – they are light, portable and small and often used to record events – and now we have smart glasses, but how does their ease and regularity of use sit with an individual’s right to privacy? Hod do you really know if they are recording?

The Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) regulates the use of listening devices.  That Act also covers the use of data surveillance, optical surveillance devices and tracking devices. Breaches of the Act can lead to criminal charges.

What is a listening device?

The Act defines a listening device as:

“any device capable of being used to overhear, record, monitor or listen to a conversation or words spoken to or by any person in conversation, but does not include a hearing aid or similar device used by a person with impaired hearing to overcome the impairment and permit that person to hear only sounds ordinarily audible to the human ear”

so it clearly includes mobile phones, GoPros and video cameras… and yes, smart glasses!

It is an offence under s.7 to knowingly install, use or cause to be used or maintain a listening device to overhear, record, monitor or listen to a private conversation to which the person is not a party or to record a private conversation to which the person is a party.

There are some exceptions to this however, such as if:

  • all principal parties to the private conversation expressly or impliedly consent to its use, or
  • you are a principal party to the private conversation and:
    • it is reasonably necessary to protect your lawful interests; or
    • you do not intend to communicate or publish what was recorded or a report of it to anyone who was not party to the private conversation

The onus of proof for establishing an exception lies on the party seeking to establish the exception, and that onus is on the balance of probabilities.

Law enforcement officials can use listening devices in a range of circumstances including where they have a warrant from a Judge or Magistrate; if they don’t have a warrant but there is a serious or urgent matter requiring its use but not enough time to get a warrant; or where a police officer wearing a visible body worn video device etc.

Even if in Court proceedings, the exception to the rule is not found to apply, it might still (but in certain circumstances only) be possible to have the recording, or evidence based on it such as a transcript of what was said, admitted into evidence under the improperly obtained evidence rules in s.138 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).

What is a private conversation?

A private conversation is conversation where it can be reasonably assumed that those involved in the conversation do not want the conversation to be overheard by others, that is, it is more informal or not public. A private conversation is not private if the people in the conversation can reasonably expect the conversation to be overheard by others…. so be careful when in public as you may be recorded.

Penalties

The best course is generally not to record a private conversation without consent unless it is absolutely necessary.

The penalty for individuals for a serious breach of the Act is an $11,000 fine or up to 5 years in prison.

A person who intentionally or recklessly communicates or publishes the contents of a private conversation which could endanger the health or safety of someone, or prejudice an investigation, faces a maximum penalty of 7 years in prison.

For corporations, offences under the Act attract a maximum fine of up to $55,000.

FURTHER INFORMATION

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice.

For more information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au to discuss your needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter

in Criminal Law / General / Risk management  by 02 Sep 2025 0 comments

All employers now subject to employee “right to disconnect”

Whilst it isn’t news that, under amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) and consequent amendments to Modern Awards, from 26 August 2024 employees of larger employers have the new ‘right to disconnect’ outside of work hours… what many small businesses employers don’t realise is that this law will also apply to them from 26 August 2025.

What is a “small business employer”?

A small business employer is an employer with fewer than 15 employees at a particular time.

When counting the number of employees, employees of associated entities of the employer are also included. Casual employees are not included in this headcount unless they are engaged on a regular and systematic basis (but they also have the right to disconnect).

So what is the “right to disconnect”?

Employees have the right to refuse contact outside their working hours unless that refusal is unreasonable. This right means an employee can refuse to monitor, read or respond to contact from an employer or a third party (such as customers, clients, suppliers and related businesses) outside of an employee’s working hours.

Contact is broad and can include in person contact, calls, emails, texts, WhatsApp chats or through other Apps etc.

The right to disconnect is a protected right all employees have under the FW Act. An employee can’t be punished or adversely treated for enforcing a workplace right. Employees are protected from any disciplinary action for reasonably ignoring such emails.

What is “unreasonable”?

When working out whether an employee’s refusal is “unreasonable” other matters may also be considered but the following factors must be considered:

  • the reason for the contact
  • how the contact is made and how disruptive it is to the employee
  • how much the employee is compensated or paid extra for:
    • being available to perform work during the period they’re contacted, or
    • working additional hours outside their ordinary hours of work
  • the employee’s role in the business and level of responsibility
  • the employee’s personal circumstances, including family or caring responsibilities.

It will be unreasonable for an employee to refuse to read, monitor or respond if the contact or attempted contact is required by law.

Importantly, employers are not prohibited from initiating contact with employees, but the employee is not obliged to respond unless it is deemed ‘reasonable’ for them to do so.

Senior employees on large salaries will have limited access to this right as their role or remuneration already will likely include ‘reasonable additional hours’. These laws are mainly for the benefit of Award and lower level employees and those who are expected to be available on call without additional compensation.

Disputes

Disputes about an employee’s right to disconnect should first be discussed and resolved at the workplace level (s.333N).

If that isn’t possible, employees or employers can go to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) to deal with a dispute (s.333P).

The FWC can:

  • make a stop order
  • deal with the dispute in other ways (for example, by holding a conference to try to resolve the dispute), or
  • both.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information in relation to business succession, estate planning, litigation and dispute resolution or any commercial law matter, contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your commercial law needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram

in Business / Commercial Law / Dispute Resolution / Employment / General / Litigation / Risk management  by 02 Aug 2025 0 comments

Why updating ASIC records is critical

Under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), among other methods, any document may be served on a company by:

(a) leaving it at, or posting it to, the company’s registered office; or

(b) delivering a copy of the document personally to a director.

This means that ASIC, the ATO, other government authorities or any other creditor can serve important papers on a company at its former place of business (where that address has not been updated at ASIC) even if they have since moved.

Documents that could be served on a company can include:

  • Court proceedings such as an Originating Process / Statement of Claim / Summons

As these important documents can be served on a company even though they may not actually come to the attention of the company or its directors, demonstrates why updating ASIC records is critical.

Similarly, if the ATO was to serve a Director Penalty Notice (DPN) on a director, note that:

  • DPNs are sent via ordinary mail to the Director’s last recorded residential address on ASIC’s database
  • notice is given on the day the DPN is issued, not when it is or is likely to have been received
  • actual non-receipt of a DPN is not a defence.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

in Business / Commercial Law / Dispute Resolution / General / Insolvency & Bankruptcy / Litigation / Risk management  by 01 May 2025 0 comments

Order for Security for Costs

An Order for security for costs is to help ensure that unsuccessful proceedings commenced by a Plaintiff do not disadvantage the Defendant. Such applications are more usually made in relation to an appeal rather than an original matter.

A security for costs order generally requires a Plaintiff to pay a certain amount of money into Court (or a solicitor’s trust account) before their proceedings can continue – that is the proceedings are in effect stayed pending the security being provided.

The Court has several sources of power to make an order for security for costs, including:

  • the Court’s inherent power to stay proceedings to ensure the proper and effective administration of justice
  • the relevant Court rules (eg, Rule 42.21 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005);
  • s.1335 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Due to the weight an order for security for costs may carry, Courts must weigh the rights and interests of all parties to the proceedings. The Court has a broad discretion as to whether to grant such an order and will usually look to factors including (in no specific order):

  • the inherent legal right of a Plaintiff to bring legal proceedings;
  • the strengths and bona fides of the Plaintiff’s case
  • where the Plaintiff ordinarily is resident;
  • the financial standing and asset position of the Plaintiff in the jurisdiction in which the claim has been commenced (including where the Plaintiff may have divested itself of assets);
  • whether there is reason to believe that the Plaintiff can satisfy an order for costs not only from its own resources, but from other resources including those who will benefit from the litigation; the public importance of the case;
  • delay of bringing the application for the order;
  • if the Plaintiff hasn’t disclosed an address or has moved and not updated it, particularly if there is reason to believe that it was done to to avoid the consequences of the proceedings;
  • whether such an order will frustrate the litigation;
  • the justice of the case.

It is uncommon for such an order to be made against an individual Plaintiff (as opposed to a company, partnership or trustee) but not impossible, depending in the circumstances of the particular case and Plaintiff.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

in Asset Protection / Business / Commercial Law / Debt Recovery / Dispute Resolution / General / Insolvency & Bankruptcy / Litigation / Risk management  by 01 Apr 2025 0 comments

New statutory tort – Serious Invasion of Privacy

Following the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth Parliament on 29 November 2024, which amended the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and other Acts, a new statutory tort for a serious invasion of privacy will soon enter Australian law.

This new tort will commence on 10 June 2025 and confers on an individual a cause of action for serious invasions of privacy.

Elements to be proven

The tort allows individuals to take action against those:

  • who invade their privacy, either by:
    • intruding upon their seclusion; or
    • misusing their information;
  • in circumstances where the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy;
  • where the invasion is serious and either:
    • intentional; or
    • reckless; and
  • where the public interest in the plaintiff’s privacy outweighs any countervailing public interest.

The public interest considerations include the freedom of expression, freedom of the media, the proper administration of government, open justice, public health and safety, national security and the prevention of crime.

Remedies

The tort is actionable without proof of damage however, where the elements are established, a Court will be able to award damages to the plaintiff, as well as other remedies (such as injunctions, apologies, destruction or delivery of materials, accounting for profits etc) if appropriate.

Damages are capped at the greater of:

  • $478,550; or
  • the maximum award for general damages in defamation,

but there are no aggravated damages available.

Exemptions

There are exemptions for invasions of privacy by a State Authority or its staff if the invasion of privacy occurs in good faith, in the performance or purported performance of a function or exercise of power of the Authority, or in the exercise or purported exercise of a power of the authority and for law enforcement bodies and intelligence agencies. Persons under 18 are also exempt.

Limitation periods

The cause of action must be actioned within 1 year of the person first becoming aware of the invasion of privacy however if the plaintiff is unaware of the invasion, 3 years from the day the invasion occurred or if the plaintiff was under 18 when it occurred, before the plaintiff turns 21.

The introduction of this new tort marks a significant change in Australian law because until now, there has been no generally recognized right to privacy.

New crimes

Note that the Criminal Code was also amended to create new crimes for “doxxing” in sections 474.17C (criminalizing the release of personal data using a carriage service (ie, internet or telecommunications services) in a manner that a ‘reasonable person’ would regard as menacing or harassing) and section 474.17D (which focuses on such dissemination targeting individuals or groups based on their protected attributes, such as race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, disability, nationality, or ethnic origin).

These new offences maximum sentences of 6 and 7 years imprisonment respectively.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

in Criminal Law / General / Litigation / Risk management  by 04 Mar 2025 0 comments

Why you should have a Shareholders Agreement

CONSIDER THESE COMMON ISSUES

What would happen to your company if you or your business partner became so ill that one of you could no longer work – or worse still, died?

Would you still be paying dividends or making distributions of profit to that person even through he or she is not around, or to their spouse or family?

If they died and left their spouse everything in their Will (including their shares in your company), would you want to be in business with his or her spouse?

What if your business partner sold his or her shares in your company to a complete stranger or a competitor following an argument?

How are your shares to be valued and over what period will the purchase payments be made to your family? Or is there an insurance policy to fund the payment in a lump sum?

HOW CAN A SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT HELP?

A Shareholders Agreement can cover these not uncommon scenarios and tailor the rights and obligations of the shareholders of a company to fit your personal circumstances and your particular business to help avoid some of these potential problems for everyone’s ultimate benefit.

You may have a Will, but you may not have certainty in relation to what will happen to your family or your business in the event of your death or serious illness unless these matters are clearly dealt with in a Shareholders Agreement.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information in relation to business succession, estate planning, litigation and dispute resolution or any commercial law matter, contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your commercial law needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram

in Business / Commercial Law / Dispute Resolution / General / Risk management  by 10 Feb 2025 0 comments