Risk management

New statutory tort – Serious Invasion of Privacy

Following the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth Parliament on 29 November 2024, which amended the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and other Acts, a new statutory tort for a serious invasion of privacy will soon enter Australian law.

This new tort will commence on 10 June 2025 and confers on an individual a cause of action for serious invasions of privacy.

Elements to be proven

The tort allows individuals to take action against those:

  • who invade their privacy, either by:
    • intruding upon their seclusion; or
    • misusing their information;
  • in circumstances where the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy;
  • where the invasion is serious and either:
    • intentional; or
    • reckless; and
  • where the public interest in the plaintiff’s privacy outweighs any countervailing public interest.

The public interest considerations include the freedom of expression, freedom of the media, the proper administration of government, open justice, public health and safety, national security and the prevention of crime.

Remedies

The tort is actionable without proof of damage however, where the elements are established, a Court will be able to award damages to the plaintiff, as well as other remedies (such as injunctions, apologies, destruction or delivery of materials, accounting for profits etc) if appropriate.

Damages are capped at the greater of:

  • $478,550; or
  • the maximum award for general damages in defamation,

but there are no aggravated damages available.

Exemptions

There are exemptions for invasions of privacy by a State Authority or its staff if the invasion of privacy occurs in good faith, in the performance or purported performance of a function or exercise of power of the Authority, or in the exercise or purported exercise of a power of the authority and for law enforcement bodies and intelligence agencies. Persons under 18 are also exempt.

Limitation periods

The cause of action must be actioned within 1 year of the person first becoming aware of the invasion of privacy however if the plaintiff is unaware of the invasion, 3 years from the day the invasion occurred or if the plaintiff was under 18 when it occurred, before the plaintiff turns 21.

The introduction of this new tort marks a significant change in Australian law because until now, there has been no generally recognized right to privacy.

New crimes

Note that the Criminal Code was also amended to create new crimes for “doxxing” in sections 474.17C (criminalizing the release of personal data using a carriage service (ie, internet or telecommunications services) in a manner that a ‘reasonable person’ would regard as menacing or harassing) and section 474.17D (which focuses on such dissemination targeting individuals or groups based on their protected attributes, such as race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, disability, nationality, or ethnic origin).

These new offences maximum sentences of 6 and 7 years imprisonment respectively.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

in Criminal Law / General / Litigation / Risk management  by 04 Mar 2025 0 comments

Why you should have a Shareholders Agreement

CONSIDER THESE COMMON ISSUES

What would happen to your company if you or your business partner became so ill that one of you could no longer work – or worse still, died?

Would you still be paying dividends or making distributions of profit to that person even through he or she is not around, or to their spouse or family?

If they died and left their spouse everything in their Will (including their shares in your company), would you want to be in business with his or her spouse?

What if your business partner sold his or her shares in your company to a complete stranger or a competitor following an argument?

How are your shares to be valued and over what period will the purchase payments be made to your family? Or is there an insurance policy to fund the payment in a lump sum?

HOW CAN A SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT HELP?

A Shareholders Agreement can cover these not uncommon scenarios and tailor the rights and obligations of the shareholders of a company to fit your personal circumstances and your particular business to help avoid some of these potential problems for everyone’s ultimate benefit.

You may have a Will, but you may not have certainty in relation to what will happen to your family or your business in the event of your death or serious illness unless these matters are clearly dealt with in a Shareholders Agreement.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information in relation to business succession, estate planning, litigation and dispute resolution or any commercial law matter, contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your commercial law needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram

in Business / Commercial Law / Dispute Resolution / General / Risk management  by 10 Feb 2025 0 comments

Advantages of Testamentary Trusts

WHAT IS A TESTAMENTARY TRUST?

A Testamentary Trust in simple terms is a trust that is established by a person’s Will (and Testament), as opposed to a trust created during someone’s lifetime, like a family trust, discretionary trust, units etc.

Unlike with a “basic” Will – pursuant to which where beneficiaries receive the benefit of any gift personally – with a Testamentary Trust, the beneficiaries receive the benefit of the gift, but rather than having it legally owned by them personally, a trustee holds the relevant asset in trust for them.

Wills with Testamentary Trusts are recommended by many lawyers, accountants and financial advisers for various reasons but the advantages of Testamentary Trusts include asset protection and taxation advantages*.

ASSET PROTECTION POSSIBILITY

Because of the legal ownership differs from the beneficial interest, Testamentary Trusts can offer beneficiaries significant and important advantages such as asset protection. As the trustee of the Testamentary Trust owns the asset (not the primary beneficiary personally), creditors and trustees in bankruptcy of the relevant beneficiary cannot gain access to the asset, so it can remain for the benefit of the intended beneficiary and their family etc.

Often, beneficiaries that are in business for themselves have implemented asset protection measures so as to keep their assets safe from claims by third parties. The last thing that such a beneficiary may want is to receive an inheritance in their personal name, effectively undoing all of their efforts to safeguard their assets!

Testamentary trusts can offer beneficiaries significant taxation advantages and a level of asset protection.

Testamentary Trusts can be drafted so as to have the beneficiary effectively control the trust and for that control to be relinquished on the occurrence of certain events, such as bankruptcy or divorce/marital separation, with a nominated person or persons to act in the role of trustee whilst such incapacity remains.

POTENTIAL TAXATION BENEFITS

Rather than taking a gift in a personal capacity as would usually be the case with a more “simple” Will, with a Will incorporating Testamentary Trusts, beneficiaries may have the ability to split income earned amongst other people in their family such as spouses, children, grandchildren or any other company or trust in which they have an interest.

Where a deceased estate has income producing assets (such as an investment property or a share portfolio), under a more simplistic will, the beneficiary personally receiving that gift would have the income earned from such asset/s added on top of the income they receive from their employment or their own investments. This could mean that they go into the next marginal tax bracket and pay significantly more tax.

A Testamentary Trust allows the income earned in the trust to be split amongst the various family members, many of whom are likely to either not be working (so the tax-free thresholds become available) or earn lower incomes (and are therefore in lower taxation brackets).

Children under 18 years of age that receive income from a Testamentary Trust are taxed at marginal rates as if they are adults (as opposed to the how income from standard discretionary / family trusts, where can be taxed at unearned income penalty tax rates) so for a family with a non-working spouse and several children, significant income can be received by the family whilst very little or no tax may be payable on the testamentary trust income.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information in relation to estate planning, business succession or any other commercial law matter, contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au.

in Asset Protection / Business / Estate Planning / General / Insolvency & Bankruptcy / Probate / Risk management / Tax Planning / Trusts  by 05 Jan 2025 0 comments

Statement of Testamentary Intention

Section 100(2) of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) provides that a written statement made by a deceased person during their lifetime which may explain or justify the provisions of a will is admissible in evidence.

This means that a Court can have regard to the Deceased’s wishes and intentions as expressed in such statements, often called a “Statement of Testamentary Intention“, in making a decision regarding the distribution of their estates such as where a Family Provision Order has been sought (an order which effectively alters the division and distribution of a deceased person’s estate, deviating from that stated in their Will to which Probate has been granted).

Where a person makes a Will that they think may ultimately be contested (such as where an estranged child is left out of the Will), then a Statement of Testamentary Intention can be executed at the same time, whereby the person making the Will sets out their reasons for excluding that person as a beneficiary.  A Statement of Testamentary Intention is often made in the form of an Affidavit or Statutory Declaration, but it can even include an audio-visual recording of the person making the Will made with their consent, statements made orally to another person or even a contemporaneous email, but a written and sworn statement is usually the best if time permits.

The risk in making a Statement of Testamentary Intention is that if for example:

  • it is not documented properly;
  • was not made contemporaneously with the Will; or
  • where a significant period had elapsed between the making of the s.100 Statement and the time of the Deceased’s passing (that is, it is not up to date – as the reasons may have been eroded by later interactions and events etc, such as where a relationship has been repaired)

then it can lack evidentiary weight and can even act to benefit the excluded person, such as:

  • if it notes matters that would ordinarily be considered ‘hearsay’ (such that it can be objected to being admitted into evidence);
  • where unsubstantiated opinions or slurs are used; or
  • where there are factual statements or reasons given that can be shown to be incorrect

as they can undermine the basis of the will-maker’s decision to exclude a person and bolster the plaintiff’s case against the estate.

Usually the reasons for excluding a beneficiary from a Will should not be stated in the Will itself, but if they are to be documented, should be set out separately in the s.100 Statement so that the Executor can decide whether or not to use it in evidence.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram

in Dispute Resolution / Estate Planning / General / Litigation / Probate / Risk management  by 01 Nov 2024 0 comments

Partnership Agreements

A partnership is defined in the Partnership Act 1892 (NSW) as “the relation which exists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view of profit”.

Advantages of having a partnership, in addition to having additional business owner/s to bounce ideas off and share the workload, can include the fact that there is virtually no cost to establish it, little external regulation and very little paperwork involved.

Disadvantages include unlimited joint and several liability, a maximum of 20 business owners, liability for the acts and omissions of partners and risk of disagreement between partners.

Although the Act does govern some aspects of the partnership relationship, a Partnership Agreement can be invaluable when there is a difference of opinion or the relationship between partners breaks down as often happens.

Similar to a Shareholder Agreement, a Partnership Agreement can cover:

  • the business name the partners will trade under
  • the agreed business activities of the partnership
  • how the partnership will be managed (regular meetings, duties and responsibilities)
  • contributions to the partnership  and the agreed partnership percentage/split (and hence how profits and losses are shared)
  • how the respective interests in the partnership are valued
  • retirement, death and expulsion of partners (and if and how new partners can be introduced)
  • whether any post-partnership restraints apply
  • agreed dispute resolution mechanisms

Partnership Agreements can be simply drafted to cover common situations or be specifically tailored to your specific your business.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram

in Business / Commercial Law / Dispute Resolution / General / Risk management  by 01 Oct 2024 0 comments

Why use an IP License Deed?

Any forms of intellectual property (IP), whether they be trade marks, copyright or others, can be licensed for use by third parties. It is effectively renting them out, like an asset hire arrangement for physical assets. So why use an IP License Deed?

A licensing arrangement is advantageous to the holder of the IP as royalties, licensing fees or other forms of payment can generate revenue for the benefit of the holder of the IP, in addition to confirming that the IP remains held by the holder even though it may be used by the licensee.

Another common reason for the use of an IP License Deed is to aid in asset protection, such as where one entity may hold assets (such as IP) and another entity may trade (and hence incur liabilities and hold risk). The licensing arrangement means that the “at risk” entity that is using the IP can do so without putting the IP itself at risk. If the trading entity finds itself in financial difficulty or ends up in external administration or liquidation, then the license can be terminated and the IP returns to the control of the asset holding entity.

Licenses do not have to be written, but it is strongly recommended as it can prevent arguments and uncertainty.

License Agreements can cover things including:

  • term and territory
  • whether the use is exclusive or not
  • obligations when using the IP (eg, not to adversely affect the IP)
  • matters that result in termination
  • obligations on termination (such as return of all forms of IP and stop all further use)

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | X | Instagram

in Business / Commercial Law / Dispute Resolution / Intellectual Property / Risk management  by 01 May 2024 0 comments

What is a Deed Poll?

In a previous article, we explained the difference between Deeds and Agreements however, there is a special type of Deed that does not require more than one party to sign it to make it legally binding (although it can also be made by more than one party, jointly).

That document is the Deed Poll. As soon as it is signed by the party that executes it, it becomes immediately operative and binding.

Deed Polls are solemn declarations, so they are commonly witnessed by lawyers, Justices of the Peace and notaries (but they requirements as to who can be witnesses and whether you need one can differ between States and Territories).

Deed Polls are used for various purposes such as:

  • part of the process of changing your name or gender
  • affirming your identity (such as where you may use more than one name)
  • declaring:
    • a promise to do not not to do something (including keeping information confidential)
    • the validity of a document or right
    • a fact or intention
  • releasing rights

The unilateral obligation/s created by a Deed Poll can be enforced by any person with whom the covenant in the document was made as against the party making it, so they ought not to be entered into lightly.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

in Business / Commercial Law / Dispute Resolution / Estate Planning / General / Litigation / Risk management / Uncategorized  by 01 Dec 2023 0 comments

Leasing business premises from a SMSF

Many business owners own the commercial or industrial premises that they use to operate their business from.  Often that property is owned by a Self-Managed Superannuation Fund (SMSF).

Leasing business premises from a SMSF is becoming commonplace. SMSFs can be a tax-effective way to create wealth and provide for your retirement, in addition to providing some asset protection benefits however, they come with a requirement to comply with the Superannuation Investments (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) (SIS Act) and its Regulations.

Additional obligations apply when the SMSF is using a limited recourse borrowing arrangement and bare trust when borrowing to acquire the premises and consideration ought to be given to who the members of the fund are and what happens if they were to pass away.

One of the leasing obligations on SMSF trustees in the SIS Act is that there be a written Lease in place. Not only does there need to be a Lease in place, but it must be at ‘arms length‘ and on commercial terms.  This effectively means that it must have all of the usual or typical terms that would be expected to be in place if the property was being rented to a third party, for example with market rent being required to be paid in full and on time, with no discounts.

Practically, there are other benefits of having a proper Lease in place and one of them is that on the sale of the business, the Lease can be assigned to the purchaser so that the SMSF continues to get the benefit of the Lease and its protections after you cease to run the business. It also can assist your SMSF to maintain the value of the premises as any purchaser of the land is bound by it, so having a good yield is important.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

in Business / Commercial Law / Dispute Resolution / Estate Planning / General / Property / Risk management / Superannuation  by 01 Oct 2023 0 comments

What is independent legal advice?

If you are:

  • borrowing money from a bank or someone else, like a parent,
  • have some special vulnerability in relation to a borrowing arrangement (such as due to age, inability to speak English well etc),
  • borrowing in relation to a self managed superannuation fund’s limited recourse borrowing arrangement, or
  • perhaps going guarantor on a loan for a company or a family member for their loan,

then chances are you will be asked to get “independent legal advice” from a solicitor in relation to the loan and the security for the borrowing or guarantee.

The document evidencing the loan is usually a:

  • Loan Agreement,
  • Letter of Offer or similar

and may have accompanying terms and conditions etc.

Security for a loan arrangement usually takes the form of a:

  • Mortgage,
  • Caveat or
  • Security Interest registered on the PPSR.

Independent advice us usually required by the lender so that it cannot (easily) be argued later that the borrower or guarantor didn’t understand the gravity of the arrangements being put in place – so although you get the advice, it is really for the lender’s protection.

In order to give independent legal advice, the lawyer will read the loan and security documents provided, advise you as to the meaning and effect of them and discuss any risks.

You will then be required to sign a document called a Declaration under oath confirming that you obtained independent legal advice before you freely and voluntarily signed the loan/guarantee/security documents.

Often the lender will also require the borrower or guarantor to obtain “independent financial advice” from a financial advisor, accountant or other appropriately qualified person. Lawyers, simply by virtue of their profession, possess no special skill to give financial (as distinct from legal) advice.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

in Asset Protection / Business / Commercial Law / Dispute Resolution / General / Litigation / Property / Risk management  by 01 Aug 2023 0 comments

Severing a joint tenancy

If you own real property with others, then it is either held as “joint tenants” or as “tenants in common“. For more information on the difference between both, please click here.

Assuming land is held jointly, on your death it will pass to the surviving joint tenant/s regardless of what you state in your Will. This is known as the “right of survivorship” and it operates because each joint owner of the property owns the whole of the land at the same time as the others, so the deceased owner simply drops off the title leaving the remaining joint tenants on title. This isn’t automatic as the land registry needs to have the details of the death to update the register, but it is a relatively simple process.

Joint tenancy may be a suitable scenario for a husband and wife where the survivor expects to retain the house however, generally joint tenancy is not suitable for investments as the investors would want their family or beneficiaries to inherit their interest in the property on their death, rather then their co-owners on title. From an estate planning perspective, tenants in common would generally be more sensible in this situation.

Property is sometimes incorrectly held as joint tenants because, for example:

  • people inherit property from their parents jointly with siblings, but they intend for their own children to inherit it on their deaths, rather than it staying with their surviving siblings;
  • sometimes purchasers just don’t understand the difference or don’t take advice at the time of acquiring a property (or the advice they got was wrong); or
  • they have divorced or separated and not taken any steps to separate their assets, update their property interests or estate planning arrangements

however, this is not a massive problem provided that they identify the issue and seek to rectify it without delay;

You can sever a joint tenancy. Severing a joint tenancy changes the nature of ownership so you and your co-owners own the land as tenants in common, which allows you to leave your share of the property to anyone in your Will (or if you don’t have a Will, under the laws of intestacy).

NSW Land Registry Services allows joint tenancies to be severed (converted to tenants in common) either unilaterally or with the consent of the other joint owners.

No stamp duty is payable in such a severance.

FURTHER INFORMATION

For further information in relation, please contact McKillop Legal on (02) 9521 2455 or email help@mckilloplegal.com.au 

This information is general only and is not a substitute for proper legal advice. Please contact McKillop Legal to discuss your needs.

Stay up to date – LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

in Business / Commercial Law / Dispute Resolution / Estate Planning / General / Property / Risk management  by 01 Jul 2023 0 comments